Cit vs surinder pal anand

Author: yksv

August undefined, 2024

WebIn the application, the four aforesaid daughters were also mentioned against column 3. Inder Pal, the respondent, it appears, was a nominee under the policy; Yogesh Kumar, … WebJan 30, 2024 · i) CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264 (P&H HC) ii) Nand Lal Popli vs. DCIT [ITA1161&1162/Chd/2013 dt. 14/06/2016] Accordingly the addition of Rs. 27,94,306/- u/s. 68/69A was directed to be deleted. The view full text of the judgment: Click here --------------------------------- Summarized by: CA. Shashank A. Mehta

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “A”: NEW …

WebAfter relying upon a judgment of this Court in CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand (2010) 48 DTR 135 (P&H), the Commissioner allowed the assessee's appeal and ordered deletion of the amount of Rs. 18,31,500/- as ordered to be added to his income by the assessing officer. Webdecision of Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT Vs Surinder Pal Anand 192 Taxmann 264 and submitted that once the return of income is filed U/s 44AD of the Act, the turnover declared by the assessee cannot be doubted. The assessee is not required to explain each greeter badges for church

Section 44AD not obligates assessee to maintain books of …

WebJan 4, 1994 · v. Surinder Pal Anand . ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, “the Act” … WebJun 29, 2010 · Case Name : CIT Vs. Surinder Pal Anand (Punjab & Haryana High Court) Appeal Number : Appeal No: ITA No. 156 of 2010. Date of Judgement/Order : … WebSep 19, 2024 · The Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), under identical circumstances had held as follows’.-“7. Section 44AD of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1994. Sub-section (1) of section 44AD clearly provides that where an assessce is engaged in the business of civil ... greeter at walmart pay

Presumptive Taxation: Assessee not under obligation to explain …

Presumptive Taxation and additions – Digest of case laws

WebOct 27, 2024 · Before the CIT (Appeals), the assessee stated that the profits were declared as per the scheme of presumptive taxation @ 8% which the Assessing Officer cannot disturb. ... Reliance was placed on the judgment of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Surinder Pal Anand in ITA No.156 of the Act 2010 dated 29.6.2010 … WebDec 24, 2024 · It was submitted by the ld AR that the settled proposition of law is that when on the basis presumptive basis return is filed u/s 44AD then the assessee is not under obligation to explain individual entry of cash deposit and reliance was placed on the judgment of Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court of Punjab and Haryana in case of CIT Vs ... greeter at the gates battle catsWebSep 11, 2024 · The Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), had held as follows:- “7. Section 44AD of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1994. focal shape 50 レビュー

"Web(hereinafter referred as Ld. Pr. CIT) u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (herein after refered as the Act). 2. The facts in brief are that the assessee filed return of income of Rs. 1,44,320/- by computing income u/s 44AD of the Act. The case of the assessee was taken up for scrutiny and the ld AO made an addition of Rs. " - Cit vs surinder pal anand

Cit vs surinder pal anand

Whether Addition u/s. 68/69A valid, when assessee opted for

WebSep 13, 2024 · Surinder Pal Anand (2010) 192 Taxman 264 (P&H ) The assessee filed his return of income showing certain business income under section 44AD. The Assessing Officer did not accept the return and made an addition in respect of the cash deposited in the bank account during the year.

Did you know?

WebSep 18, 2024 · The Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), under identical circumstances had held as follows’.- “7. Section 44AD … Webi) CIT v/s Surinder Pal Anand, Surinder Pal Anand, [2011] 242 CTR 0061 (P&H HC) Assessment being made under s. 44AD, the assessee was not under obligation to explain individual entry of cash deposit in the bank unless such entry had no nexus with the gross receipts and therefore no addition under s. 68 was called for.

WebThe Commissioner Of Income Tax vs P.V.Kalyanasundaram on 8 February, 2006. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08/02/2006 Coram THE … WebAug 29, 2015 · CIT V. Surinder Pal Anand [2010]192Taxman264(P. &H.) Under section 44AD when the books of account were not maintained, income has to be estimated only at 8 per cent. Hence, estimating the income at 8 per cent cannot be regarded as illegal. Commissioner of Gift-tax v. A.Vajjiram& Bros.[2010] 326 ITR 551(MAD.)

WebJun 29, 2010 · Case: CIT Vs Surinder Pal Anand. High Court of Punjab (India) Judgment Cited in Precedent Map Related Vincent Judgment: Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. 1. WebSep 19, 2024 · Reliance was placed on the judgment of Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Surinder Pal Anand in ITA No. 156 of the Act 2010 dated …

WebThe Commissioner Of Income Tax vs S M Anand on 23 August, 2024. Author: S.Sujatha And N.K.Sudhindrarao. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI …

WebCommissioner Of Income Tax-Ii vs Gurinder Pal Singh on 25 March, 2013 User Queries cash deposit furniture mandi gobindgarh 44af section 44af cash deposit in bank 44ad 2015 july withdrawal from bank surinder pal anand Try out our Premium Memberservices: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Serviceand an ad-free experience. focal shape 65 studio monitorWebJul 4, 2024 · Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 Taxman 264, wherein in Para 8 it was stated that- once under a special provision , exemption from maintaining books is provided and rate of 8% of gross receipts... focal seizure treatment medicationsWebSurinder Pal Anand, 242 CTR 61(P&H). 6. Ld D.R. on the other hand, relied on the order of the CIT(A). 7. of lower authorities and materials available on record. In the instant case, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee has made cash deposit of ₹20,67,668/- … focal sharesWebJan 8, 2024 · The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264 held that once under special provision of section 44AD … greeter at the gatesWebMar 14, 2024 · Surinder Pal Anand 192 Taxman 264 for the preposition that once the exemption from maintaining books of account has been provided under the special provision and presumptive tax @ 8% has been made the basis for determining taxable income, the assessee was not under any obligation to explain individual entry of cash deposit in the … focals glasses by northWebThe CIT(A) upheld the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of initial payment of installment of vend allotted, initial investment in the infrastructure in purchase of … greeter churchWebMar 28, 2024 · Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii vs Gurinder Pal Singh on 25 March, 2013. Section 260 in The Income- Tax Act, 1995. ... placed reliance on a decision rendered by Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of CIT v. Surinder Pal Anand [(2011) 242 CTR 61, wherein it was held as follows: “8.Once under the special provision, exemption from ... focal shape 65 vs krk v6 s4 review